Workflow

Accelerated prioritization

Drive prioritization at mission speed. We inject proven, actionable evidence into the workflows of Combatant Command strategy teams, Primes, and Tech Providers.

Request a briefing

Three steps

From mission context to decision

A structured, repeatable process that works at scale

Step one

Intake and scoping

Capture mission context, operational needs, coalition requirements, and desired outcomes rapidly

Step two

Data-driven assessment

Evaluate technologies against mission relevance, integration risk, interoperability, and cyber resilience

Step three

Prioritized scorecard and evidence trail

Deliver decision-ready rankings, detailed justification, and defensible recommendations

01

02

03

01

Built for mission

Configurable to your operational context

Adapt the assessment framework to your specific mission set, coalition requirements, and decision timelines. No two campaigns are alike—your prioritization shouldn't be either.

02

Secure by design

Audit trails and defensible records

Every assessment is logged and traceable. Maintain compliance, demonstrate due diligence, and defend your technology choices to stakeholders and oversight bodies.

03

Open architecture

Plugs into your existing systems

Connect with your acquisition platforms, portfolio management tools, and risk systems. No rip-and-replace. No vendor lock-in. Just faster decisions.

Case Studies

Workflow in action

See how teams accelerated prioritization and reduced integration risk

Campaign technology prioritization at scale

How a combatant command ranked 40+ technologies in two weeks

Mission-Driven Technology Selection For Emerging Domains

In emerging domains like Quantum and Space, technology selection must shift from chasing novelty to prioritizing mission-fit through disciplined Mission Engineering. This article explores how frameworks like MEIA and platforms like Tyr enable leaders to field high-consequence capabilities by aligning technical potential with validated mission outcomes.

NATO Standards Alignment and Rapid Capability Deployment

NATO is transforming standards from slow, procedural checklists into enablers of rapid, interoperable capability fielding. This article explains how the Rapid Adoption Action Plan, modernized STANAGs, and ACT’s “Innovate-Test-Adopt-Adapt” loop are designed to get AI, autonomy, and C2 technologies into allied formations in 24 months or less.

C2 Modernization at Mission Speed

C2 modernization must move at the speed of the threat, not the speed of the bureaucracy. This article explores how Mission Engineering and MEIA are transforming C2 from a slow-moving program into a high-velocity, evidence-backed capability for the joint and coalition force.

Aligned With Current Government Funding Agency Expectations

DoD’s 2026 research‑security mandates have transformed compliance from a paperwork exercise into a prerequisite for funding, demanding continuous vetting, full transparency, and auditable risk controls. Platforms like Azymmetric’s Tyr help universities meet these expectations by automating screening, centralizing disclosures, and ensuring institutions operate as low‑risk, high‑trust research partners.

Reducing Integration Rework in Defense Modernization

U.S., Australian, and UK forces are slowed not by a lack of advanced systems, but by integration rework that emerges too late in the modernization cycle. Mission‑aligned prioritization platforms like Tyr cut deployment timelines by surfacing conflicts early, aligning work to operational value, and keeping integration continuously tied to real mission threads.

Technology Company Vendor gained clarity on mission application and adoption pathway

Stop wasting venture capital on "Transition Traps" and start navigating the defense sector with a data-driven roadmap that bridges the gap between commercial success and battlefield deployment. This post reveals how the Tyr platform transforms guesswork into a strategic advantage, providing the mission-fit analytics and expert credibility required to turn innovative tech into a fielded capability.

Defense Prime Eliminated Integration Rework

Defense acquisition is shifting from “build–test–fix” to “model–assess–buy,” using digital engineering and structured assessment platforms to eliminate costly integration rework before hardware is ever built. By validating interfaces, performance, and risks in a virtual environment, primes cut overruns, accelerate fielding, and deliver predictable, evidence‑backed capability at the speed the 2026 threat environment demands.

Why the 2026 Operating Environment Demands a New Assessment Rhythm

This post details how a Mission Engineering & Integration Activity (MEIA) approach transforms J8 directorates from "spreadsheet factories" into strategic engines by replacing manual data reconciliation with high-velocity, kill-chain modeling. By shifting from document-centric workflows to a structured data platform, defense organizations can compress 90-day assessment cycles into 15-day sprints that outpace evolving threats.

Combatant Command can cut assessments from months to weeks

Modern threat cycles move in weeks, but combatant command assessments still take months, creating a dangerous gap between intent and capability. Structured‑speed platforms—combining automation, continuous data integration, and parallel collaboration—compress assessment timelines without sacrificing rigor, enabling faster fielding, stronger interoperability, and true decision dominance.

Slow decisions in a fast-evolving threat landscape

Defence organizations face competing priorities

Ready to prioritize

See how Azymmetric's workflow fits your mission needs

Request briefing

Get started now

Tell us about your mission and we'll show you the workflow

Thank you. We'll be in touch with your briefing details.

Something went wrong. Please try again.